global warming
There may be a viable nuclear power solution
In a previous post, the problem of relicensing existing nuclear reactors. Yet, it’s critical that we move to carbon dioxide free ways of generating electricity. The fact is that while there is political debate about global warming, the science is quite clear that the planet is heating up and that it’s highly correlated with increasing C02 in the atmosphere.
There is an interesting possibility, though. Bill Gates has backed a firm called TerraPower, and they have developed an interesting idea for an alternative to today’s reactors. Check out the video below.
The advantages of a traveling wave reactor technology are
- They are less expensive to build and run.
- The use existing waste material from the current generation of operating reactors.
- The avoid the costly and dangers need to replace fuel.
- They can be built to run for 100 years on one fueling.
Keep in mind that at this moment, they are elaborate models on supercomputers. Now the task is to take them from the drawing board to a working prototype.
Glenn Beck and nuclear power
From time to time I check out Glenn Beck. Today was one of those days. Of course, the topic of conversation was the emerging nuclear disaster in Japan, and that morphed into a conversation about the USA nuclear industry. In a nutshell, Glenn pointed out that 20% of our power today comes from nuclear plants. So, if we didn’t get that from nuclear plants and we couldn’t increase the use of coal or fossil fuels because of the carbon emissions, then what would we, as Americans, be willing to unplug. Not to mention the fact that the price of electricity would soar.
The real nuclear power problem
In case you haven’t been paying attention, lots of folks, including President Obama have been talking about building new shinny nuclear power plants as part of the solution to meeting our energy needs without creating a big carbon emission footprint. And with the emergence of electric cars that actually seems to make sense… less cars putting carbon in the air and the power plants putting less carbon in the air. Aha, but here is the dilemma. Wall Street doesn’t like new nuclear power plants. So, where’s the money to build them going to come from because it isn’t from private industry. In steps government subsidies.
Actually, what is really happening is that while all the talk in front of the camera is about new nuclear power plants, the thing that is really going on behind the scenes is the effort to extend the operating licenses of the current 104 nuclear power plants in the USA. The problem is that for the most part, those plants were engineered to have about a 40 year life… and are reaching the end of the life now. But, wanting to squeeze every drop of profit possible out of these plants, the nuclear industry is petitioning to extend their life by another 20 years and run them at 10 to 20 percent over capacity. That’s not a good thing because, guess what… radiation causes metal to get brittle and break. Yup, most of the parts in these aging plants are made of metal. Is something wrong with this picture or what?
Thinking out of the box
The reason we seem to have such difficulty solving problems is that we fail to think out of the box. The particular box we are stuck in is created by the economic interests of some very very powerful industries like oil, power, and defense. We are stuck in building great big centralized power companies because that’s how the power industry makes profit. The keep charging everyone their monthly electric bill and watch the dollars roll in… ka-ching, ka-ching.
Let’s look at a totally out of that box solution. First let’s put a few facts on the table.
- According to the Census Bureau, there are about 13,000,000 households in the USA.
- The annual military spending in the USA is about $664,000,000,000 per year.
- Oil companies make $230,000 a minute in profits but receive big subsidies from the government.
- A recent House bill would strip $38,000,000,000 in subsidies from the oil companies over 5 years.
- The Cato Institute has estimated that real oil subsidies are between $78,000,000,000 and $158,000,000,000 per year when you include the cost of securing the flow of oil from the Middle East. That doesn’t include the cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
- The cost of to equip a household with solar panels is about $15,000 when you consider economies of scale.
So do a little math. The cost to convert all USA households to solar panels is about $195,000,000,000. If we do that over a 10 year plan, that’s about $20,000,000,000 per year. Let’s take away the $38,000,000,000 in oil subsidies ($7,000,000,000 per year). Then lets cut military spending by 2 percent ($13,000,000,000) per year. Bingo, we just paid for every single home in the United States to have solar panels. If we add one more year to the plan, then everyone can have solar panels, solar water heating, and solar heating. Oh yea, what about all the jobs that would be created in the solar industry.
Now think about the implications. Each year more and more homes would both become independent of the power grid (that means no more electric bills) and would, in fact, contribute their excess electricity to the power grid that would be used by all the non-households like businesses and governments… and yes, they can be converted to solar too!
Robin Hood economics
The problem is that such an out of the box solution is Robin Hood economics. Take money away from the rich, powerful industries with lots of lobbyists and give it to all the ordinary folks out there… and we live in an economic system that the Sheriff of Nottingham and Prince John would be proud of.
Yet it is becoming more and more apparent that many solutions to problems we face are likely to be found in the decentralization of technology. Personal power generation, personal water purification, and local food production. Now your challenge is to think how you can bring this personalization of technology into your life to make a better world.
Find Out More – Click Here
You can save a ton of money on your energy bills… and save the environment by going green at the same time.
In fact, it’s been done for thousands of years. The ancient Greeks and Egyptians built their homes to absorb as much sunlight each day as possible. That’s right, the answer is in sunlight!
And today, the ultimate energy solution is your own solar panel system that converts sunlight directly into electricity. Electricity that can heat and cool your home or office, run your appliances, turn your lights on, keep your TV and stereo entertaining you, and even get you around in your electric car.
Sunlight is the ultimate source of all energy on our planet.
It always has been and it always will be.
It’s always there. You won’t run out of it. Nobody can turn it off. It never pollutes the air. And, nobody can put it in a jar and charge you for using it… not one single dime.
Sounds great, doesn’t it? The problem is that a solar panel system for your house has been really expensive… over 20,000 dollars. And face it, even if you spend just $100 a month on electricity that means it will take over 15 years for a solar panel system to pay for itself… and that’s not so great, is it?
But what if you can have a solar panel system for a lot less… a whole lot less? What if you could even start by powering a few choice appliances and gradually built your whole house system as you could afford it? And what if you could be getting electricity free in a couple years?
That right, your solar panel system could pay for itself in a couple years and you would get all your electricity for heating, cooling, appliances, entertainment, and transportation 100 percent free!
Wouldn’t you be interested in that? Of course you would.
You can build your own multiple solar panel system where each panel costs less to build than a typical one month electric bill… and you don’t need to be a master craftsman to get it built. In fact, it’s easy!
Find out more about how simple and easy it is to build your own solar panel system.
Just Click Above.







