I’ve been reading a few comments, and, frankly this has inspired me to write an addendum to The Value of Nothing and the Wisdom of the Bodhisattvas. One of my favorite movies is Oh God You Devil staring George Burns who plays both God and the Devil. One scene where someone is interviewing the devil goes like this…
Interviewer: What is your greatest invention?
The Devil: Language
Another approach to that concept was provided by on of my teachers who said, “Modern man has lost the ability to distinguish reality from symbolic abstractions.” Let me provide an example.
Most people would say that a flower is a real thing. Yet, if you get a room full of people together and ask them to write down a description of a flower you will get some that say “a plant”, others that say “a rose”, others that say “a tulip”, and so forth. So really, flower is really an abstraction for a category of things. It is not a real thing itself. What about a “rose”? If you go through the same exercise you will get “red roses”, “yellow roses”, “bush roses”, “climbing roses”, and so forth. So rose, as real as it sounds, is another symbolic abstraction. Well, you can keep taking this to the next level and the next level until it starts to drive you crazy. What about things like love, freedom, conservative, liberal, and all the other similar abstractions we find in our language. I suspect that no two people agree on precisely what any of those terms mean.
Let’s shift for a moment to human beings. When you think about it, all human beings have the same real concerns. They want to eat, they want to have a place to sleep, they want to feel safe, they want to have companionship. Whether you are liberal, conservative, American, Russian, Arabic, Christian, Jew, Socialist, Lawyer, Doctor, or Indian Chief, your basic needs are the same as other the needs of other people. That is what is real and that’s an extremely important to point. When it comes to the realities of living, all people — past, present, and future — face the same issues.
Yet, throughout history certain individuals have discovered that they can promote their own self interests by creating linguistic abstractions that obscure the sameness of all people and, instead create divisions. By creating the abstractions that mentally create the “good guys” and the “bad guys” somebody ends up with more money or power. Yet, that is precisely the illusion that many religions talk about.
So, the question is whether it is a higher value for everyone to focus on the abstract divisiveness in order to get what’s yours or to focus on the sameness and try to ensure that all people get their real human needs met.
Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these.
Jesus clearly gives us the commandment to focus on the sameness of our neighbors and not on imagined diversity. That is our challenge in making the word better because it’s critical for us to understand that can only happen if it’s better for everyone. It is, again, the Bodhisattva Vow. Returning to the so-called “free market” value system, keep in mind that our cultural moral ideal overturned the tables of the money changers and said, “Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.” Enough said.









Sooo, in your “model,” it is evident that the free-market system is evil and the cultural moneychangers overturned it, or are trying to. Sooo, in your “enough said” symbolic abstractions, it is perfectly okay for Islamic thugs to kill civilians…as a military target. That is quite similar to Planned Parenthood considering a human fetus as their “military target,” and causing you to believe with all your heart that the fetus is just a lump of tissue to be discarded from a woman’s body, like fecal excrement. I am not as mentally challenged as you are. It is easy for me to see abstractions, see through abstractions, and to get by…the distractions of the truth. I am a born-again, spirit-filled christian, and I believe (because of our source) that we can be the smartest people in the world. And don’t use “relativism” as a way to conveniently shed the great importance of the free-market system in the U.S.
I am genuinely baffeled at your comment. I didn’t say a word about Isalmic thugs, Planned Parenthood, or relativeism. I don’t know how you read that into anything I posted. Thank you because you have provided perfect examples of exactly what I was talking about. In addition, I refuse to engage in personal attacks.
The point that you seem to be missing is that if we expect our world to improve… that means to stop things like “Islamic thugs”, people being thrown out of their homes, people going hungry, etc. [and I hope you agree those are bad things]… then we’ve got to stop just parading around being Christian and actually start paying attention to what Christ actually said. I can’t think of a single place in the New Testament which I have read in English, Latin, and Greek that says we should take advantage of people for our own gain. Instead he emphasizes the opposite.
The problem is not the free market system. The problem is a relatively small percentage of greedy self-centered people who have preverted the ideas of free market economics to suit their own advantage at the expnese of a whole lot of other people. They have taken control of our government and they buy Congressmen in one way or another to further their selfish purposes. We cannot mask the negative emotions of greed, anger, and hate in linguistic babbel to make it look like a good thing. There is no need in free market theory to cause suffering, yet greedy people do cause suffering. And they do that by using the spin that language can accomplish to trick people into thinking they are doing good things. I want to emphasize that even Alan Greenspan has acknowledged that the free market over focus was actually a flawed model that led to bad things not good things. He should know.