December 16, 2009
2012 And The Real Planetary Change
Have you seen the movie 2012? Pretty spectacular special effects, but really kind of a dud.
Contrary to popular notions 2012 doesn’t mark the end of the world on the Mayan calendar. It is more accurate to think of it as the end of an era. David Wilcock describes it as more of a crisis point (my term). It’s a point at which energies are lined up so that humanity can make a change in direction.
J. Krishamurti
J. Krishnamurti describes the crisis we are facing as a crisis in consciousness in which we can no longer accept the old thinking, patterns, norms, and traditions. Yes, that means that we’ve got to use our brains like we have never used them before and decide if we are going to grow up or remain a species trapped by lower emotions. You know… things like anger, greed, fear, and stupidity.
Do you ever look at world events and ask yourself exactly who put the crazy people in charge? I’m reminded of a movie called The King of Hearts. In it a World War II Scottish soldier goes into a village in France where all the citizens have evacuated except for those in the local insane asylum. The doors to the asylum have been opened and the patients have taken over the main roles in the city like the mayor, the chief of police, and the local judge. Well, I feel like I’m living this movie every time I turn on the television, read the newspaper, or check out one of the political blogs. Think about it. There are people who really think that providing health care for our citizens is a bad thing. There are other people who doubt climate change despite seeing big chucks of glaciers melting throughout the world.
Anger, greed, fear, and stupidity really put blinders on people’s eyes. But here is the thing… you can’t take the blinders off of other people’s eyes, you can only take them off of your own eyes. Work on shifting your own consciousness, not on trying to convince others. If you live the example of your ideas, then you will impact others by the example of your own life. As 2010 approaches, I see a challenge in front of me, you , and everybody else to start changing the way we think about things. More to come later…
Filed under The Planet, politics by Ron
Spread the Word!
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to comment
Ready for Serious Change? Check out the Master Key System. It's a 24 week course that is the foundation of most personal development systems and started the Law of Attraction. If you like The Secret or Think and Grow Rich by Napolean Hill then you'll want to see what got them started.
Comments on 2012 And The Real Planetary Change »
THE major causes of global warming (if any), are solar flares and volcanos. If just one (just one) volcano "blows" (and this is EASILY checked out), the "dust," debris, and poisonous gases from that ONE volcano will intensely darken, heat up, and poison a whole hemisphere… and then some. This isn't rocket science; it's simple geology. Solar flares (the matter from the sun) will "fry" a satelite if they screw up and don't turn it off before the solar matter hits it. That's not exactly rocket science either…it's more like "communications" and how to save your multimillion dollar, multitasking satelite. The damage transportation does to our atmosphere is soundly infinitesimal compared to the damage just one volcano does to this earth. Research how many active volcanos there are on the earth. Hawaii has one. It's on the tour. And that is not rocket science either. That is just having knowledge (that makes me well-armed) of geology, volcanos, and chemistry. So, Al Gore can fly on his stupid jet all he wants, and spew verbal pollution (lies) all he wants. The United States paying pollution fines isn't going to "change" (abra cadabra!) the temperature of the earth ANY cooler (or warmer for that matter). His knows nothing of the world-changing "event" of a volcano or a solar flare. End of story!
As far as solar flares goes isn't it really the EMF (not infrared) and high energy particles that fry satellites' circuits and not heat? What about the measured thermal reductions caused by the debris from volcanoes blocking sunlight in the upper atmosphere? If there is a net increase in the earth's temperature… and there seems to be with glacial melting… then if volcanoes and solar flares are the source of that heat wouldn't the frequency of solar flares and volcanic activity have had to increased to cause the increase in temperature? Has that actually happened? If that is so, then why is that? Also, isn't there a high correlation between observations of the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and the temperature? The scientific community seems to be pretty convinced of that point. What do you think?